HAPPY NEW YEAR...Everyone.
The "Accountability" tidal wave is rolling along quite merrily with new developments being reported globally.
In my own backyard members are openly questioning past decisions and the merits or lack thereof that they were/are based on.
We believe that Premium Dues should equal Premium service.
The membership wants the leadership to answer these questions;
Why a position was left vacant for two or more months, at the very time that the company was demanding clawbacks?
Why was an in-house job out-sourced?
Why is this position a "Monopoly"?
Is a monopoly the best way to assist employees?
Why has this position been reviewed-But never the individuals performance or history? Why? Why is it a Monopoly?
Sunday, February 04, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)